There is something deeply strange about the world when you look closely enough. A gold atom is mostly empty space. The proton at its center, though it feels solid, is itself a seething cluster of quarks bound by a force so powerful it cannot be separated at any energy humans have yet produced. The electron orbiting that proton is not a tiny ball at all but a probability cloud, a smeared-out possibility of presence, until you choose to measure its position. And underlying all of this is a mathematical structure of extraordinary elegance and almost offensive incompleteness.

Particle physics is the attempt to answer the simplest and hardest question in science: what is matter, and what holds it together? The answers accumulated over the past century have given us the Standard Model, a theory that predicts experimental results to eleven decimal places and leaves most of the universe unexplained. It is the most successful and the most incomplete theory in physics, possibly in all of science.

"Not only is the universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think." -- Werner Heisenberg

Key Definitions

Particle physics (also called high-energy physics) is the branch of physics that studies the fundamental constituents of matter and the forces that govern their interactions, using accelerators, detectors, and theoretical quantum field theories.

The Standard Model is the theoretical framework describing all known elementary particles and three of the four fundamental forces (electromagnetic, weak, strong), expressed as a gauge quantum field theory.

Elementary particle is a particle with no known substructure; it is not composed of smaller particles. Quarks and electrons are elementary; protons are not.

Quantum field theory is the framework combining quantum mechanics and special relativity in which particles are excitations of underlying quantum fields that permeate all of space.

The Standard Model: Particles at a Glance

Category Particle Symbol Charge Role
Quarks Up, Down u, d +2/3, -1/3 Constituents of protons and neutrons
Quarks Strange, Charm s, c -1/3, +2/3 Found in exotic hadrons
Quarks Bottom, Top b, t -1/3, +2/3 Heaviest quarks; top mass ~173 GeV
Leptons Electron e -1 Carries electric current; defines chemistry
Leptons Muon, Tau mu, tau -1 Heavier electron cousins
Leptons Neutrinos nu_e, nu_mu, nu_tau 0 Weakly interacting; produced in nuclear reactions
Gauge bosons Photon gamma 0 Carrier of electromagnetic force
Gauge bosons W+, W-, Z W, Z +1, -1, 0 Carriers of weak nuclear force
Gauge bosons Gluon g 0 Carrier of strong nuclear force
Scalar boson Higgs H 0 Gives mass to W, Z bosons and fermions

Rutherford and the Nuclear Atom

The modern story of particle physics begins at the University of Manchester in 1909. Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, working under Ernest Rutherford, directed a beam of alpha particles at a sheet of gold foil only a few atoms thick and recorded the scatter pattern using zinc sulfide scintillation screens surrounding the foil. Under the prevailing Thomson plum pudding model, the positive charge and mass of an atom were thought to be distributed diffusely throughout its volume, like a positive cloud with electrons embedded like raisins. Alpha particles should have passed through with minimal deflection, like bullets through a cloud.

Most did. But approximately one in eight thousand alpha particles deflected at angles greater than 90 degrees, bouncing almost straight back. Rutherford concluded in his 1911 paper that the atom's positive charge and nearly all its mass must be concentrated in an extraordinarily compact nucleus. His calculations placed the nuclear radius at less than one ten-thousandth of the atomic radius. The atom was almost entirely empty space.

This experiment did more than revise the atomic model. It established the fundamental methodology of particle physics: probe the unknown structure by scattering known particles off it and inferring internal geometry from the deflection pattern. The logic is unchanged in every modern particle accelerator, from the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center's discovery of quark substructure in the 1960s to the Large Hadron Collider at CERN today.

The Quantum Revolution

Rutherford's nuclear model immediately ran into a problem. Classical electromagnetism required that electrons orbiting a nucleus would radiate energy and spiral inward, destroying atoms in nanoseconds. Niels Bohr patched this with his 1913 atomic model, postulating that electrons occupied discrete energy levels without radiating, but his model was purely phenomenological, with no physical justification for the quantization.

The solution emerged over the following decade. Louis de Broglie proposed in 1924 that particles have wavelike properties, with wavelength inversely proportional to momentum. Werner Heisenberg developed matrix mechanics in 1925. Erwin Schrodinger developed wave mechanics in 1926, producing his equation for the time evolution of the quantum wave function. Max Born provided the probability interpretation: the wave function's squared magnitude gives the probability density for finding the particle at each location.

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, published in 1927, states that the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum cannot be less than Planck's constant divided by four pi. This is not a statement about measurement limitations but about the fundamental nature of quantum states: a particle with precisely defined position has maximally uncertain momentum and vice versa. The electron does not have a definite trajectory; it exists as a probability amplitude until a measurement interaction localizes it.

Antimatter: Dirac's Prediction and Anderson's Discovery

Paul Dirac combined quantum mechanics with special relativity in his 1928 equation describing the relativistic electron. The Dirac equation had solutions corresponding not only to electrons but also to particles with the same mass but opposite charge. Dirac initially tried to identify these with protons, then reluctantly accepted that they represented a new particle. He predicted the existence of the positron in 1931.

Carl Anderson photographed a positron track in a cloud chamber in 1932, the first confirmed observation of antimatter. The track curved in the wrong direction for an electron in a magnetic field and was far too light to be a proton. Anderson received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1936.

Every elementary particle has a corresponding antiparticle of equal mass and opposite charge and other quantum numbers. When a particle and its antiparticle meet, they annihilate, converting their combined rest mass into energy in the form of photons or other particle-antiparticle pairs. The question of why the observable universe consists overwhelmingly of matter rather than antimatter, given that the Big Bang should have produced them in equal quantities, is one of the deepest unsolved problems in physics.

The Standard Model: Particles and Forces

Quarks and the Strong Force

Quarks are the fundamental constituents of hadrons. Murray Gell-Mann proposed quarks in 1964 to make sense of the proliferating zoo of hadrons discovered in cosmic ray and accelerator experiments. There are six quark flavors: up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom. Each comes in three color charges (red, green, blue) and has an antimatter counterpart. Deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC in 1968-1969, led by Jerome Friedman, Henry Kendall, and Richard Taylor (Nobel 1990), confirmed that protons had pointlike internal scattering centers.

Quarks carry color charge and interact through the strong force, mediated by eight gluons in quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Gluons themselves carry color charge, making QCD non-abelian and qualitatively different from electrodynamics. Confinement means color-charged objects cannot be isolated: trying to pull a quark out of a proton creates enough energy to produce a new quark-antiquark pair. Asymptotic freedom, discovered by David Gross, David Politzer, and Frank Wilczek in 1973 (Nobel 2004), means that quarks behave as nearly free particles at very short distances (high energies) but are strongly interacting at larger separations. This is the opposite of the intuitive expectation and was the insight that made QCD tractable.

Leptons and the Weak Force

Leptons do not carry color charge and do not interact through the strong force. The charged leptons are the electron, muon, and tau. Each is paired with a neutrino: the electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino. Neutrinos are electrically neutral and interact only through the weak force and gravity, making them extraordinarily difficult to detect despite being produced in enormous quantities by nuclear reactions in the Sun and by supernovae.

The weak force mediates radioactive beta decay and is responsible for processes that change quark flavor, such as the conversion of a neutron into a proton. It is mediated by three massive bosons: the W-plus, W-minus, and Z. Their large mass, roughly 80-91 GeV compared to the massless photon, explains why the weak force has such short range.

Electroweak Unification

Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam, and Steven Weinberg developed the electroweak theory in the 1960s and early 1970s, demonstrating that electromagnetism and the weak force are two aspects of a single electroweak interaction whose symmetry is spontaneously broken at the energies of everyday physics. They received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1979. The prediction of the W and Z bosons with specific masses was confirmed by Carlo Rubbia and Simon van der Meer's team at CERN in 1983 (Nobel 1984).

Quantum Electrodynamics

QED, developed by Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga (Nobel 1965), describes how charged particles interact by exchanging virtual photons. Its most famous achievement is the prediction of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron: theory and experiment agree to roughly one part in a trillion, a precision unmatched anywhere in science. The technique of renormalization, which Feynman's diagrammatic method implements, systematically handles the infinities that arise from self-interactions by absorbing them into measured physical parameters.

The Higgs Boson: The Final Piece

The electroweak theory required the W and Z bosons to be massless by gauge symmetry, yet experiments showed they were not. Peter Higgs, Robert Brout, Francois Englert, and others proposed in 1964 a mechanism of spontaneous symmetry breaking: a scalar field (the Higgs field) permeates all of space with a non-zero vacuum expectation value. The W and Z bosons acquire mass by coupling to this field. Fermion masses arise through Yukawa couplings to the same field. The quantum of the Higgs field is the Higgs boson.

The Higgs boson was the Standard Model's only unconfirmed prediction for nearly five decades. Finding it required building the Large Hadron Collider, a 27-kilometer ring beneath the Franco-Swiss border that accelerates protons to 6.5 TeV and collides them at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy. The collision products are tracked by the 25-metre-tall ATLAS and 21-metre-long CMS detectors, each involving thousands of collaborating physicists.

On July 4, 2012, both collaborations announced the discovery of a new particle at approximately 125 GeV with properties consistent with the Higgs boson. Statistical significance exceeded five sigma in both experiments. Peter Higgs and Francois Englert received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2013.

Since discovery, the LHC has measured the Higgs boson's properties in increasing detail. Its spin is confirmed as zero. Its couplings to other particles are consistent with Standard Model predictions at current precision. Ongoing measurements seek deviations that would indicate new physics contributing to Higgs couplings.

Neutrino Masses: The First Crack in the Standard Model

The minimal Standard Model assumed neutrinos were massless. This assumption was overturned by two experimental findings. Ray Davis's Homestake chlorine detector, operating in a South Dakota gold mine from the late 1960s, consistently measured only about one-third of the electron neutrino flux predicted from solar models, a discrepancy called the solar neutrino problem. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada resolved this by 2001: the total neutrino flux from the Sun (summing all three flavors) matched predictions, but the electron neutrinos had transformed into muon and tau neutrinos in transit.

The Super-Kamiokande detector in Japan demonstrated in 1998 that atmospheric muon neutrinos, produced when cosmic rays hit the upper atmosphere, disappeared over long baselines in a way dependent on the ratio of travel distance to neutrino energy, the signature of oscillation. Takaaki Kajita and Arthur McDonald received the 2015 Nobel Prize for these discoveries.

Neutrino oscillation requires that neutrino mass eigenstates differ from flavor eigenstates and that at least two mass eigenstates have different (nonzero) masses. This requires minimal extensions to the Standard Model. The absolute mass scale of neutrinos remains unknown; current upper limits place all three masses below roughly 0.1 eV, making them at least 500,000 times lighter than the electron but not massless.

Dark Matter and Dark Energy: The Majority of the Universe

Ordinary matter, everything described by the Standard Model, constitutes approximately 5 percent of the universe's total energy content. Dark matter constitutes roughly 27 percent and dark energy roughly 68 percent. Neither has been directly detected as a particle or field in the laboratory.

Evidence for dark matter is compelling and comes from multiple independent probes. Galaxy rotation curves measured by Vera Rubin and Kent Ford from the 1960s onward show that stars orbit at nearly constant speed far from galactic centers, implying that mass continues to increase proportionally with radius even beyond the visible disk. Gravitational lensing surveys show mass concentrations far exceeding luminous matter. The Bullet Cluster provides a particularly clean demonstration: two colliding galaxy clusters whose gas (most of the ordinary matter) was slowed by electromagnetic interactions during collision, while gravitational lensing reveals the mass passed through, consistent with collisionless dark matter halos. The cosmic microwave background power spectrum requires a component of matter that does not interact with photons.

The leading candidates remain WIMPs (weakly interacting massive particles), predicted by supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model, and axions, motivated by the strong CP problem in QCD. Direct detection experiments using multi-tonne xenon detectors buried deep underground have set increasingly stringent limits without a confirmed signal, progressively ruling out parameter space but not the existence of dark matter.

Dark energy was inferred from type Ia supernova distance measurements by the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team in 1998. Both groups found that distant supernovae were fainter than expected, indicating the universe's expansion is accelerating. Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, and Adam Riess received the 2011 Nobel Prize. The simplest description is Einstein's cosmological constant, representing a constant energy density of the vacuum. But quantum field theory predictions for vacuum energy density exceed the observed cosmological constant by approximately 120 orders of magnitude, the most severe fine-tuning problem in all of physics.

Beyond the Standard Model

The Standard Model has no dark matter candidate, no explanation for the matter-antimatter asymmetry, no mechanism for neutrino mass without modification, and no accommodation of gravity. These gaps motivate theoretical extensions, none of which has experimental confirmation.

Supersymmetry (SUSY) posits that every Standard Model particle has a supersymmetric partner with different spin, providing natural dark matter candidates (the lightest supersymmetric particle) and addressing the hierarchy problem (why the Higgs mass does not receive enormous quantum corrections). The LHC has searched extensively for supersymmetric particles and found none at masses below roughly a TeV, straining but not eliminating SUSY.

String theory proposes that fundamental particles are not point-like but are different vibrational modes of one-dimensional strings, and requires extra spatial dimensions compactified at extremely small scales. It naturally incorporates gravity but currently makes no testable predictions at accessible energies.

Loop quantum gravity takes a different approach, quantizing spacetime geometry directly. The relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics remains one of the deepest open problems in physics.

Cross-References

References

  1. Rutherford, E. (1911). The scattering of alpha and beta particles by matter and the structure of the atom. Philosophical Magazine, 21, 669-688.
  2. Dirac, P.A.M. (1928). The quantum theory of the electron. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 117(778), 610-624.
  3. Anderson, C.D. (1933). The positive electron. Physical Review, 43(6), 491-494.
  4. Gell-Mann, M. (1964). A schematic model of baryons and mesons. Physics Letters, 8(3), 214-215.
  5. Gross, D.J. and Wilczek, F. (1973). Ultraviolet behavior of non-abelian gauge theories. Physical Review Letters, 30(26), 1343-1346.
  6. Weinberg, S. (1967). A model of leptons. Physical Review Letters, 19(21), 1264-1266.
  7. ATLAS Collaboration and CMS Collaboration (2012). Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716(1), 1-29.
  8. Fukuda, Y. et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration) (1998). Evidence for an oscillatory signature in atmospheric neutrino oscillation. Physical Review Letters, 81(8), 1562-1567.
  9. Riess, A.G. et al. (1998). Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant. Astronomical Journal, 116(3), 1009-1038.
  10. Perlmutter, S. et al. (1999). Measurements of omega and lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae. Astrophysical Journal, 517(2), 565-586.
  11. Particle Data Group (2022). Review of particle physics. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(8), 083C01.
  12. Heisenberg, W. (1927). Uber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 43, 172-198.

Tags

particle physics Standard Model Higgs boson quantum mechanics quarks dark matter physics science

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Rutherford's gold foil experiment reveal about atomic structure?

By 1909, the dominant model of the atom was the Thomson plum pudding model, which pictured a diffuse cloud of positive charge with electrons embedded throughout like raisins. Ernest Rutherford, Hans Geiger, and Ernest Marsden tested this model at the University of Manchester by firing alpha particles, positively charged helium nuclei, at an extremely thin sheet of gold foil and recording where the particles ended up using a zinc sulfide scintillation screen.The results were startling. Most alpha particles passed straight through with little deflection, consistent with the diffuse plum pudding. But a small fraction deflected at large angles, and roughly one in eight thousand bounced almost straight back. Rutherford famously described his astonishment: 'It was almost as incredible as if you fired 15-inch shells at a piece of tissue paper and they came back and hit you.'The only explanation consistent with the data was that nearly all of the atom's mass and all of its positive charge were concentrated in an extraordinarily small, dense central nucleus. Rutherford announced the nuclear model of the atom in 1911. The nucleus occupies roughly one hundred-thousandth of the atom's diameter, meaning that the atom is overwhelmingly empty space. If the nucleus were the size of a marble, the electrons would orbit at a distance of roughly half a kilometer.This experiment established the methodology of particle physics: use high-energy probes to scatter off targets and infer the internal structure from the deflection pattern. The logic of deep inelastic scattering experiments at the Stanford Linear Accelerator in the 1960s, which revealed quarks inside protons, was directly descended from Rutherford's original insight. Every particle collider ever built operates on the same principle.

What is the Standard Model of particle physics?

The Standard Model is the quantum field theory that describes the fundamental constituents of matter and three of the four known fundamental forces: electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force. Gravity is not included. Developed progressively from the 1960s through the 1970s, it remains the most precisely tested theory in all of science.Matter particles are fermions, meaning they have half-integer spin and obey the Pauli exclusion principle. They divide into two families. Quarks (up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom) carry color charge and interact through the strong force; they combine into composite hadrons such as protons (two up quarks and one down quark) and neutrons (two down and one up). Quarks are never found in isolation, a phenomenon called confinement. Leptons (electron, muon, tau, and three associated neutrinos) do not carry color charge and ignore the strong force. Each of these twelve matter particles has an antimatter counterpart.Force-carrying particles are bosons, with integer spin. The photon mediates electromagnetism. The W-plus, W-minus, and Z bosons mediate the weak force, responsible for radioactive beta decay. Eight gluons mediate the strong force. The Higgs boson, discovered in 2012, is associated with the Higgs field, which gives mass to the W and Z bosons and to fermions through their coupling strength.The Standard Model is organized by symmetry principles expressed in the mathematical language of gauge theories. Despite its extraordinary predictive success, it is widely regarded as incomplete. It contains no dark matter candidate, has no mechanism for the observed predominance of matter over antimatter in the universe, cannot accommodate neutrino masses without modification, and does not include gravity. These gaps drive the ongoing search for physics beyond the Standard Model.

What is quantum electrodynamics and what are virtual particles?

Quantum electrodynamics, or QED, is the quantum field theory of the electromagnetic force. It describes how charged particles such as electrons interact by exchanging photons and how those photons couple to charge. Developed in the late 1940s by Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, who shared the 1965 Nobel Prize in Physics, QED was the first successful relativistic quantum field theory and the template for all subsequent ones.Earlier attempts to combine quantum mechanics with electromagnetism produced infinite, meaningless results for quantities such as the electron's self-energy. Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga independently developed the technique of renormalization, which systematically absorbs these infinities into measured physical parameters like the electron mass and charge, yielding finite, finite, physically meaningful predictions at every order of calculation.Feynman diagrams are the iconic pictorial calculus of QED. Each diagram represents a term in a perturbation series, with vertices representing interactions and lines representing particle propagators. The more vertices (couplings) a diagram has, the smaller its contribution, because the fine structure constant (roughly 1/137) is small. Summing increasingly complex diagrams yields predictions of extraordinary precision.Virtual particles are a feature of the quantum field theory formalism. In Feynman diagrams, internal lines represent particle propagators that are not constrained to obey the energy-momentum relation of real particles; they are said to be off-shell or off mass-shell. These internal lines are called virtual particles. They are mathematical terms in the perturbation expansion, not directly observable entities. The force between two electrons is conventionally described as arising from the exchange of virtual photons.QED's best-known triumph is the prediction of the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron. Theory and experiment agree to roughly one part in a trillion, making it the most precisely confirmed prediction in the history of physics.

How was the Higgs boson discovered and why does it matter?

The Higgs boson is the quantum of the Higgs field, a scalar field that permeates all of space. Its existence was proposed in 1964 by Peter Higgs at the University of Edinburgh and independently by Robert Brout and Francois Englert in Brussels and by Gerald Guralnik, Carl Hagen, and Tom Kibble in London. The mechanism they described solved a critical problem in the electroweak theory: the W and Z bosons, carriers of the weak force, are very massive, but gauge symmetry seemed to require that force carriers be massless. Spontaneous symmetry breaking of the Higgs field gives mass to the W and Z bosons while keeping the photon massless.The predicted particle was the final missing piece of the Standard Model for nearly half a century. Finding it required the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, the most powerful particle accelerator ever built, which accelerates protons to 99.9999991 percent of the speed of light in a 27-kilometer ring beneath the Franco-Swiss border and smashes them together at collision energies of up to 13 TeV.On July 4, 2012, the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN announced the discovery of a new particle with a mass of approximately 125 GeV (about 133 times the mass of a proton) whose properties were consistent with those predicted for the Higgs boson. The discovery was made with statistical significance exceeding five sigma, the conventional threshold for a discovery claim in particle physics, meaning the probability of the signal being a statistical fluctuation was less than one in three million. Peter Higgs and Francois Englert were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2013.The Higgs boson matters for several reasons beyond completing the Standard Model. Its mass value has profound implications for the stability of the universe: calculations suggest the universe may be in a metastable vacuum state, meaning a quantum tunnel to a lower-energy state is theoretically possible, though the timescale would vastly exceed the current age of the universe. Measuring the Higgs's couplings to other particles with precision allows physicists to test whether the Standard Model description is complete or whether new physics influences Higgs behavior.

What are neutrino oscillations and why do they point beyond the Standard Model?

Neutrinos are electrically neutral, extremely light fermions that interact only through the weak force and gravity. They were postulated by Wolfgang Pauli in 1930 to explain apparent violations of energy conservation in beta decay and detected experimentally by Clyde Cowan and Frederick Reines in 1956. For decades the Standard Model assumed neutrinos were massless.Neutrino oscillation is the quantum mechanical phenomenon whereby a neutrino created in a specific flavor state (electron, muon, or tau neutrino) can later be detected in a different flavor state. The probability of finding the neutrino in an alternate flavor oscillates as a function of the distance traveled divided by the neutrino energy. Oscillation can only occur if neutrinos have nonzero masses and if the mass eigenstates (the states with definite mass) are not the same as the flavor eigenstates.The evidence for oscillation accumulated from multiple sources. The solar neutrino problem had puzzled physicists since the 1960s: the Sun produces far fewer electron neutrinos than theoretical models predicted. Ray Davis's Homestake experiment detected roughly one third of the expected flux. The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada resolved the problem in 2001 by detecting all three neutrino flavors in total, confirming that the missing electron neutrinos had oscillated into other types. Separately, the Super-Kamiokande detector in Japan found in 1998 that atmospheric muon neutrinos produced by cosmic ray interactions in the upper atmosphere showed clear evidence of oscillation as a function of the distance to the detector.Takaaki Kajita (Super-Kamiokande) and Arthur McDonald (SNO) shared the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physics for these discoveries. Neutrino masses, though extremely small, require modifications to the minimal Standard Model. The most natural explanation involves a see-saw mechanism with very heavy right-handed neutrinos, entities that have not been observed but whose existence would have profound implications for understanding the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe.

What are dark matter and dark energy, and what do we actually know about them?

Dark matter and dark energy together account for approximately 95 percent of the total energy content of the universe. Ordinary matter, every atom in every star, planet, gas cloud, and living thing, constitutes only about 5 percent. Despite their predominance, neither dark matter nor dark energy has been directly detected or identified with any known particle or field.The evidence for dark matter is extensive and comes from multiple independent observations. Galaxy rotation curves show that stars in spiral galaxies orbit at nearly constant speed far from the galactic center, rather than slowing down as Newtonian gravity would predict if only visible matter were present. The inference is that galaxies are embedded in extended halos of invisible matter. Gravitational lensing, the bending of light from distant galaxies by intervening mass, reveals mass concentrations that far exceed what can be accounted for by luminous matter. The Bullet Cluster, two galaxy clusters that have passed through each other, provides particularly compelling evidence: X-ray observations show the hot gas, which constitutes most of the ordinary matter, slowed and separated during the collision, while gravitational lensing maps reveal that the mass (presumably dark matter) passed through largely undisturbed. The cosmic microwave background power spectrum independently requires a component of matter that does not interact with light.The leading dark matter candidate is the WIMP (weakly interacting massive particle), a hypothetical particle with mass in the range of 10 to 1000 times the proton mass that interacts through the weak force. Despite decades of underground direct detection experiments, no WIMP signal has been confirmed. Other candidates include axions (motivated by a separate problem in QCD), sterile neutrinos, and primordial black holes.Dark energy is even more mysterious. Discovered in 1998 when two teams of astronomers (Perlmutter, Schmidt, Riess - Nobel 2011) measured the distances to type Ia supernovae and found the universe's expansion is accelerating rather than decelerating, dark energy is the name given to whatever is driving this acceleration. The simplest mathematical description is Einstein's cosmological constant, representing an intrinsic energy density of empty space. This fits the data but has no satisfactory physical explanation: quantum field theory predicts a vacuum energy some 120 orders of magnitude larger than observed, an unresolved discrepancy sometimes called the worst prediction in physics.

Share this article